online advertising free; online advertising business; effects of advertising; types of advertising; advertising lesson plans


Welcome To Slymarketing

create marketing plan; marketing job description; types of marketing

   » The Latest and The Greatest of Internet Marketing, instant access!
NAME  :  
  EMAIL  : 

Thanks to Sergey at TechWeb Media I am looking at and testing the first human powered social search engine. And I really like what I have seen so far from Stumpedia.

It’s a search engine, but instead of the spider from Google, Yahoo or any of the other major search engines, this is powered by people, like you and me. We can all submit sites and recommend sites for specific keywords and phrases, and like web 2.0 sites (digg, reddit, propeller), we can rank the websites at Stumpedia.

I guess this means that instead of like Google uses their pagerank and all sorts of algorithms to give you the spot in their serp (search engine rank page), Stumpedia trust people to rank the sites.

But is that all there is to it?

I am not sure.

You have to sign up in order to submit links to Stumpedia, and you need to sign up in order to vote on websites. Only members will get access, non-members can use it as a search engine, that’s all.

I have been testing Stumpedia for searching, and for some keywords there are not much information. For instance, I searched for Facebook and I received one website, I searched for protein and it didn’t come up with anything.

At this very moment, Stumpedia has 3,127 links, 593 members and over 3,500 search terms.

Even though Stumpedia is not that big yet, it has the potential of becoming a major player among the search engines – the only question remains, do you trust your friends to vote for the most relevant websites?

We need to trust the community at Stumpedia to come up with the top websites, and that it won’t become just another web 2.0 site packed with spammers and golddiggers out to get their own websites to the top.

Personally, I think that the biggest problem for Stumpedia is how to sget the relevant and important websites with great content to the top, instead of entertaining websites with cool and funny content.

I can give you an example.

If you do a search for George Bush, you will get three results. The one at the top is a funny YouTube video, and the next two are facts about George Bush sr and jr at wikipedia. If you compare this to the identical search in Google, the top two are the pages from wikipedia, and the YouTube video is at number 8.

What happens when people starts to submit more funny videos of George Bush? There are a lot of funny videos about this guy, and suddenly, the facts and the important information regarding the President of the United States of America is nowhere to be found.

I am just guessing here, and I hope I am not right.

I will continue to use Stumpedia to see how well it develops, you never know what will happen, but one thing’s for sure – Look out for Stumpedia.

Do You Want To See The Most Innovate New Internet Marketing System I Have Ever Tested? It's Absolutely Amazing.
Click Here To Test This Viral Marketing System!

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 10th, 2008 at 10:09 pm and is filed under Search engines. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Related posts:
No related posts
4 Responses to “Look out for Stumpedia”

Nice information and critical analysis. I will forward your post to Stumpedia development team.

Wikipedia, Digg, Facebook… all this sites powered by people. I belive that Stumpedia has a big future.

Spammers: single spammer who visited site once and added his link is OK… Let him live!

Spammer who access network to submit hundereds backlinks could be busted really fast. Single complaint from honest user will be enough to delete entire spam profile and all links which was submitted.

I think it’d be waay better if they had search results. Who is going to use a search engine that doesn’t have results for most searches?

If it were a format where it took Google’s results, and then let you vote up or down the results given and add in your own result, then it’d be better. It needs base results to get it going.

Jim August Strugges says:

Thank you for good advice. Stumpedia is a good project but this guys need little more. It is kind of bored to see no results for keywords which wasn’t submitted yet by members.
At least they got sweet instant answers feature which kind of cool and useless at the same time.
Anyway, they could go far.

[...]  New social search engine received lot of positive feedback from top blogs including: TechCrunch, SearchRank, Orangeinks, or SlyMarketing. [...]

Leave a Reply
* Name

* Mail

Website
.
.
slymarketing.com © 2007 All Rights Reserved.Designed by F5ive Technologies